tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post7495201294423594491..comments2024-03-27T03:19:01.305-07:00Comments on ISTQB Question Bank: ISTQB Foundation Sample Question Paper No. 5Sauravahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07256718808048065660noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-19465719373560005812014-04-03T10:54:24.303-07:002014-04-03T10:54:24.303-07:00Why are there only 20 questions for this test?Why are there only 20 questions for this test?Monica Ignathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06549701932584070905noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-9759244395454401322014-04-02T21:17:42.708-07:002014-04-02T21:17:42.708-07:00yeah answer should be D
yeah answer should be D<br />Arjunahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03520107727238100467noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-20514322215002356512014-03-05T07:18:14.630-08:002014-03-05T07:18:14.630-08:00so for Q1 which is the correct answer???According ...so for Q1 which is the correct answer???According to Q7 it should be D?????Bubbl3https://www.blogger.com/profile/05129986186114438414noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-21763814563862821682013-11-23T01:55:09.832-08:002013-11-23T01:55:09.832-08:00PC=4
DC=3
SC=2PC=4<br />DC=3<br />SC=2e-markets4u.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13145656636535010399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-88639741949602470532013-11-23T01:47:03.260-08:002013-11-23T01:47:03.260-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.e-markets4u.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13145656636535010399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-55307317822523071182013-11-23T01:44:44.789-08:002013-11-23T01:44:44.789-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.e-markets4u.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13145656636535010399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-63926491791417822832013-01-18T05:49:34.770-08:002013-01-18T05:49:34.770-08:00yes.. but also the BV with 3 values are correctly....yes.. but also the BV with 3 values are correctly. So in our exercise it is not mentioned what type of BV we use. Also a comment it takes me the attention: 'If you use the two-value approach together<br />with equivalence partitioning, you are equally effective and slightly more<br />efficient than the three-value approach.' But in our exercise it is not mentioned the EPFlorin's bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16866782963111327624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-56771927187169114652013-01-18T05:48:52.695-08:002013-01-18T05:48:52.695-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Florin's bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16866782963111327624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-67042725299900114102013-01-16T20:48:37.928-08:002013-01-16T20:48:37.928-08:00Hello Florin,
The correct answer for question#1 i...Hello Florin,<br /><br />The correct answer for question#1 is C.<br />As you can see in the question it will accept numbers between 1900 to 2004.<br />So the MOST boundary values that covers will be: 1899,1900,2004,2005.<br />That is what we check in 'Boundary Value' testing.<br /><br />According to ISTQB:<br />Boundary value analysis (BVA) is based on testing at the boundaries between partitions. If you have ever done 'range checking', you were probably using the boundary value analysis technique, even if you weren't aware of it. Note that we have both valid boundaries (in the valid partitions) and invalid boundaries (in the invalid partitions).<br />As an example, consider a printer that has an input option of the number of copies to be made, from 1 to 99.<br />To apply boundary value analysis, we will take the minimum and maximum (boundary) values from the valid partition (1 and 99 in this case) together with copies to be made, from 1 to 99.<br /><br />The first or last value respectively in each of the invalid partitions adjacent to the valid partition (0 and 100 in this case). In this example we would have three equivalence partitioning tests (one from each of the three partitions) and four boundary value tests.<br /><br />So in the end we get: 0,1,99,100<br /><br />Sincerely,Sauravahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07256718808048065660noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-79132618505047991742013-01-16T12:47:23.654-08:002013-01-16T12:47:23.654-08:00for Q1 the correct answer is D. for Q1 the correct answer is D. Florin's bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16866782963111327624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-17682038401822767292012-12-09T07:34:47.767-08:002012-12-09T07:34:47.767-08:00Hello Artak,
The typo for the question 14 is corr...Hello Artak,<br /><br />The typo for the question 14 is corrected with the correct option in the answer section.<br />Thanks for the explanation.<br /><br />Sincerely,Sauravahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07256718808048065660noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-56131701848424538362012-12-09T07:34:13.779-08:002012-12-09T07:34:13.779-08:00Hello Bartosz,
The typo for the question 14 is co...Hello Bartosz,<br /><br />The typo for the question 14 is corrected with the correct option in the answer section.<br />Thanks for pointing.<br /><br />Sincerely,Sauravahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07256718808048065660noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-31013966995061695342012-12-08T00:06:05.485-08:002012-12-08T00:06:05.485-08:00I think for the given example the following answer...I think for the given example the following answers are correct:<br />Path coverage - 4 tests.<br />Decision/Branch coverage - 2 tests.<br />Statement coverage - 1 test.<br /><br />Bartosz, the "statement coverage" you have introduced is a "Decision/Branch coverage".<br />But as to path coverage I agree with you it should be 4 tests.<br /><br />Thanks,ArtakAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06490167155894895953noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163851590178672572.post-49598516898094358462012-11-09T06:09:44.360-08:002012-11-09T06:09:44.360-08:00I believe that there is something wrong with the a...I believe that there is something wrong with the answer to question 14.<br />It says "...sequences of statements (PATHS)..." and to my understanding that code fragment has 4 of them : <br /><br />Statement_1, exit <br /> (Condition_1 == TRUE, Condition_2 == FALSE)<br />Statement_2, exit<br /> (Condition_1 == FALSE, Condition_2 == FALSE)<br />Statement_1, Statement_3, exit<br /> (Condition_1 == TRUE, Condition_2 == TRUE)<br />Statement_2, Statement_3, exit<br /> (Condition_1 == FALSE, Condition_2 == TRUE)<br /><br />Thus requiring 4 tests. Answer C.<br /><br />If it was regarding statement coverage - then only two tests would suffice, for example : <br /><br />Statement_2, exit<br /> (Condition_1 == FALSE, Condition_2 == FALSE)<br />Statement_1, Statement_3, exit<br /> (Condition_1 == TRUE, Condition_2 == TRUE)<br /><br />Please tell me if I'm wrong.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11473319425371667876noreply@blogger.com